Pinpoint · Judgment search

NAIS v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs

[2004] FCAFC 1

Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · 11 February 2004 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 2 Cited 2

2004: 3 citing judgments 2009: 1 citing judgment 2004 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Applicant M169 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 824 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  2. SZAHQ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 953 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Expectation Pty Ltd v PRD Realty Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 189 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 63× · judgment
  4. Khanam v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 966 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (20)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1947] EWCA Civ 1 Cited cited 715×
  2. Delta Properties Pty Ltd v Brisbane City Council (1955) 95 CLR 11 Cited cited 7×
  3. Mraz v The Queen [1955] HCA 59 Cited cited 149×
  4. Wiseman v Borneman [1971] AC 297 Cited cited 17×
  5. Odi v Osafile [1985] 1 NWLR 17 Cited
  6. Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81 Cited cited 1,205×
  7. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Ex parte Rofathullah [1989] 1 QB 219 Cited
  8. Craig v South Australia [1995] HCA 58 Applied or followed cited 1,391×
  9. Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×
  10. Boddington v British Transport Police [1999] 2 AC 143 Cited cited 16×
  11. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21 Cited cited 971×
  12. LAMINEX (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD v SMEETH [1999] NSWCA 462 Cited cited 7×
  13. Cobham v Frett [2001] 1 WLR 1775 Cited cited 3×
  14. NAAG of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 713 Cited cited 59×
  15. Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30 Cited cited 630×
  16. TKWJ v The Queen [2002] HCA 46 Cited cited 244×
  17. Fox v Percy (2003) 1997 ALR 201 Applied or followed
  18. Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] HCA 2 Applied or followed cited 1,335×
  19. Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22 Overruled or disapproved cited 1,476×
  20. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6 Applied or followed cited 918×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.