Pinpoint · Judgment search

VWST v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs

[2004] FCAFC 286

Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · 10 November 2004 · Official judgment

Cited by 24 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 6 Cited 18

2005: 3 citing judgments 2006: 4 citing judgments 2007: 7 citing judgments 2008: 5 citing judgments 2009: 3 citing judgments 2010: 1 citing judgment 2011: 1 citing judgment 2004 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Applicant S1039 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 353 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. SZEEO v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 546 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 11× · judgment
  3. SZEJN v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1355 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  4. VWFP and VWFQ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 231 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 10× · judgment
  5. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v NBDS [2006] FCA 265 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  6. Enano v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 426 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  7. NBIO v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1300 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  8. SZGCO v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 637 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  9. SZJFU v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 707 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  10. SBFD v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1171 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  11. SZELK v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1235 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  12. SZKRK v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 1821 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  13. SZDTZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1824 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 16× · judgment
  14. QAAA of 2004 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2007] FCA 1918 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  15. SZCZN v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCA 173 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  16. SZLCO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 650 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  17. Wecker v Secretary, Department of Education Science and Training [2008] FCAFC 108 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 16× · judgment
  18. Australian Olives Limited (ACN 078 885 042) v Livadaras [2008] FCA 1407 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  19. SZJEZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1741 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  20. SZMPX v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 178 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  21. SZKMX v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 842 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  22. Hu v Commonwealth Ombudsman [2009] FCA 1516 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  23. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 1,026× · judgment
  24. Tisdall v Webber [2011] FCAFC 76 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 26× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (10)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Transurban City Link Ltd v Allan [1999] FCA 1723 Cited cited 96×
  2. Thevendram v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1910 Cited cited 11×
  3. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai [2001] FCA 274 Applied or followed cited 128×
  4. Gamaethige v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 565 Applied or followed cited 49×
  5. WADE of 2001 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 214 Cited cited 6×
  6. NACB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 235 Applied or followed cited 38×
  7. W404/01A OF 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 255 Cited cited 13×
  8. NAMM of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural.& Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 32 Applied or followed cited 12×
  9. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30 Cited cited 648×
  10. NATC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 52 Cited cited 18×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.