Pinpoint · Judgment search

SZBCP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs

[2005] FCA 743

Federal Court of Australia · 9 June 2005 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 1

2005: 1 citing judgment 2006: 1 citing judgment 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. SZBJW v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1356 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  2. SZEWS v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 233 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (22)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Watson; Ex parte Armstrong [1976] HCA 39 Cited cited 255×
  2. Prasad v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1985) 6 FCR 155 Cited cited 286×
  3. Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×
  4. Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 Cited cited 452×
  5. Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh [1995] HCA 20 Cited cited 502×
  6. Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Singh (1997) 74 FCR 553 Cited cited 58×
  7. Meadows v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 90 FCR 370 Cited cited 18×
  8. Abebe v Commonwealth [1999] HCA 14 Cited cited 844×
  9. Re The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Durairajasingham [2000] HCA 1 Cited cited 616×
  10. Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala [2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×
  11. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia [2001] HCA 17 Cited cited 848×
  12. Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte H [2001] HCA 28 Cited cited 318×
  13. WACO v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 77 ALD 1 Cited cited 7×
  14. WAGU v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 912 Cited cited 28×
  15. WAEJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 188 Cited cited 39×
  16. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Palme [2003] HCA 56 Cited cited 197×
  17. WAJR v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 106 Cited cited 58×
  18. Moradian v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1590 Cited cited 5×
  19. SZATG v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1595 Applied or followed cited 5×
  20. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v NAMW [2004] FCAFC 264 Cited cited 115×
  21. WAHP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 87 Cited cited 16×
  22. QAAC of 2004 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2005] FCAFC 92 Applied or followed cited 35×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.