Pinpoint · Judgment search

SZAPC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs

[2005] FCA 995

Federal Court of Australia · 27 July 2005 · Official judgment

Cited by 10 indexed judgments

All Cited 10

2005: 1 citing judgment 2006: 1 citing judgment 2007: 1 citing judgment 2008: 1 citing judgment 2009: 2 citing judgments 2010: 1 citing judgment 2016: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. SZADO v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1409 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. Applicant M153 of 2004 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 820 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Borovina v Commissioner for Fair Trading (GD) [2007] NSWADTAP 44 Cited ADT Appeal Panel (NSW) · judgment
  4. SZCZN v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCA 173 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  5. SZMOB v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 140 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  6. SZMDS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 210 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 13× · judgment
  7. SZNKV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 56 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 15× · judgment
  8. Maxwell v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 47 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 19× · judgment
  9. Lewer v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] FCA 456 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  10. Lewer v Minister for Home Affairs [2023] FCAFC 121 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (23)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. O'Brien v Komesaroff [1982] HCA 33 Cited cited 408×
  2. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33 Distinguished cited 2,077×
  3. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×
  4. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21 Applied or followed cited 971×
  5. H v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1348 Cited cited 104×
  6. Iyer v Minister For Immigration [2000] FCA 1788 Applied or followed cited 132×
  7. H v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd (2001) 117 FRC 424 Cited
  8. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30 Applied or followed cited 1,750×
  9. Gomez v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 480 Cited cited 52×
  10. Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184 Cited cited 654×
  11. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v W306/01A [2003] FCAFC 208 Cited cited 10×
  12. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30 Applied or followed cited 648×
  13. Appellant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 71 Applied or followed cited 270×
  14. NAZZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 278 Cited
  15. NAHI v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 10 Cited cited 358×
  16. VUAX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158 Applied or followed cited 600×
  17. Applicant S70 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 182 Cited cited 4×
  18. NABE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263 Cited cited 637×
  19. NADH of 2001 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 328 Applied or followed cited 103×
  20. NAEB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 79 Distinguished cited 4×
  21. [2004] FMCA 288 Cited
  22. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB [2004] HCA 32 Applied or followed cited 456×
  23. NAVZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 13 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.