Pinpoint · Judgment search

Khera v Law Society of New South Wales (LSD)

[2005] NSWADTAP 29

ADT Appeal Panel (NSW) · 21 June 2005 · Official judgment

Cited by 10 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 9

2004: 1 citing judgment 2005: 1 citing judgment 2006: 3 citing judgments 2008: 1 citing judgment 2014: 1 citing judgment 2015: 1 citing judgment 2016: 1 citing judgment 2017: 1 citing judgment 2004 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Law Society of NSW v Khera [2004] NSWADT 25 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Khera v Jones (LSD) [2005] NSWADTAP [2005] NSWADTAP 36 Cited ADT Appeal Panel (NSW) · judgment
  3. Khera v Law Society of New South Wales (No. 2) [2006] NSWADTAP 14 Cited ADT Appeal Panel (NSW) · judgment
  4. Vice-Chancellor, University of New South Wales v Curtin and McGuirk; Curtin v Vice-Chancellor, University of New South Wales (Interlocutory Applications) [2006] NSWADT 271 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 8× · judgment
  5. Cianfrano v Director General, Premier's Department (GD) [2006] NSWADTAP 48 Applied or followed ADT Appeal Panel (NSW) · cited 6× · judgment
  6. Law Society of New South Wales v Khera (No.3) [2008] NSWADT 258 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · judgment
  7. Singh v Legal Aid Commission [2014] NSWCATAD 28 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 3× · judgment
  8. Singh v Medical Council of NSW [2015] NSWCATOD 4 Cited NCAT Occupational · cited 1× · judgment
  9. ALZ v SafeWork NSW (No 3) [2016] NSWCATAD 156 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 1× · judgment
  10. Kirby v Dental Council of New South Wales [2017] NSWCATOD 64 Cited NCAT Occupational · cited 8× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (18)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Leeson v General Council of Medical Education and Registration (1889) 43 Ch D 366 Cited cited 9×
  2. R v Sussex Justices; Ex parte McCarthy [1923] EWHC KB 1 Cited cited 69×
  3. Re S (a Barrister) [1981] QB 683 Cited cited 3×
  4. Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association [1983] HCA 17 Cited cited 424×
  5. Raybos Australia Pty Ltd v Tectran Corporation Pty Ltd (1986) 6 NSWLR 272 Cited cited 36×
  6. Re JRL; Ex parte CJL [1986] HCA 39 Cited cited 487×
  7. S & M Motor Repairs Pty Ltd v Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd (1988) 12 NSWLR 358 Cited cited 70×
  8. Vakauta v Kelly [1989] HCA 44 Cited cited 349×
  9. Re Polites; Ex parte Hoyts Corporation Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 25 Cited cited 128×
  10. Re Finance Sector Union of Australia; Ex parte Illaton Pty Ltd [1992] HCA 30 Cited cited 26×
  11. Webb v The Queen [1994] HCA 30 Cited cited 387×
  12. Aussie Airlines Pty Ltd v Australian Airlines Pty Ltd [1996] FCA 1308 Cited cited 47×
  13. Carver v Law Society of New South Wales (1997) 43 NSWLR 71 Cited cited 4×
  14. Li v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 19 Cited cited 33×
  15. Ebner v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63 Cited cited 1,161×
  16. Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte H [2001] HCA 28 Cited cited 318×
  17. Law Society of NSW v Khera [2004] NSWADT 25 Cited cited 2×
  18. Commissioner of Corrective Services v Government and Related Employees Appeal Tribunal & Ors [2004] NSWCA 291 Cited cited 9×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.