Pinpoint · Judgment search

SZEFM v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs

[2006] FCA 78

Federal Court of Australia · 14 February 2006 · Official judgment

Cited by 13 indexed judgments

All Distinguished 1 Applied or followed 3 Cited 9

2006: 7 citing judgments, 1 negative 2007: 1 citing judgment 2008: 2 citing judgments 2009: 1 citing judgment 2011: 1 citing judgment 2018: 1 citing judgment 2006 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. SZEEU v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCAFC 2 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 221× · judgment
  2. SZGPB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2006] FCA 587 Distinguished Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  3. VWBF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 851 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 19× · judgment
  4. SZBHO v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1081 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  5. SZCNP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1140 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  6. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SZFML and Anor [2006] FCAFC 152 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 14× · judgment
  7. SZHOP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1640 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  8. Goo v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 391 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  9. SZKSC v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCA 210 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  10. SZLJW v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCA 1230 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  11. SZMWT v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 559 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  12. Ogawa v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 1358 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  13. BVE16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 922 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (10)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 Cited cited 452×
  2. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Al Shamry [2001] FCA 919 Cited cited 121×
  3. Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] HCA 2 Cited cited 1,335×
  4. VAF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 123 Cited cited 223×
  5. SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] 79 ALJR 1009 Cited
  6. SZDQO v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1026 Cited cited 3×
  7. SZEZI v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1195 Cited cited 37×
  8. SZDXC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1306 Cited cited 16×
  9. SZBKB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1811 Cited cited 7×
  10. SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCA 24 Cited cited 440×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.