Pinpoint · Judgment search

Bat Advocacy NSW Inc v Minister for Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts

[2011] FCA 113 ; (2011) 179 LGERA 458

Federal Court of Australia · 17 February 2011 · Official judgment

Cited by 18 indexed judgments

All Cited 18

2011: 5 citing judgments 2012: 2 citing judgments 2014: 1 citing judgment 2015: 4 citing judgments 2017: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2023: 2 citing judgments 2024: 2 citing judgments 2011 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. SZORJ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 251 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. Bat Advocacy NSW Inc v Minister for Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts [2011] FCAFC 59 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 47× · judgment
  3. Oliver v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 534 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  4. Krajniw v Brisbane City Council (No 2) [2011] FCA 563 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 11× · judgment
  5. Bat Advocacy NSW Inc v Minister for Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 84 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 20× · judgment
  6. Henderson v Corporation of the City of Adelaide (No 2) [2012] FCA 9 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  7. Soliman v University of Technology, Sydney [2012] FCAFC 146 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 72× · judgment
  8. SZSHV v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 253 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 51× · judgment
  9. Ayoub v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 83 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 114× · judgment
  10. Krajniw v Newman (No 2) [2015] FCA 673 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  11. Brown v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 141 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 34× · judgment
  12. Mehta v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1096 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  13. Poroa v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 826 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  14. Mason v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 1787 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  15. CRNL v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 252 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  16. RNSQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1111 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  17. Munkara v Santos NA Barossa Pty Ltd (No 3) [2024] FCA 9 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  18. Jattan v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 866 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (22)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Thomas v Thomas [1947] AC 484 Cited cited 28×
  2. Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1947] EWCA Civ 1 Cited cited 715×
  3. Avon Downs Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1949] HCA 26 Cited cited 337×
  4. Kentucky Fried Chicken Pty Ltd v Gantidis [1979] HCA 20 Cited cited 61×
  5. Steed v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1981) 4 ALD 126 Cited cited 5×
  6. Parramatta City Council v Hale (1982) 47 LGRA 319 Cited cited 132×
  7. ARM Constructions Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1986) 65 ALR 343 Cited cited 6×
  8. Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) v Cainero (1988) 15 ALD 368 Cited cited 13×
  9. Westpac Banking Corporation v Spice (1990) 12 ATPR 51 Cited cited 3×
  10. Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Taveli (1990) 23 FCR 162 Cited cited 48×
  11. Dodds v Comcare Australia (1993) 31 ALD 690 Cited cited 35×
  12. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×
  13. Booth v Bosworth (2001) 117 LGERA 168 Cited
  14. ZHANG v CANTERBURY CITY COUNCIL [2001] NSWCA 167 Cited cited 606×
  15. Traill v McRae [2002] FCAFC 235 Cited cited 13×
  16. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30 Cited cited 648×
  17. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Palme [2003] HCA 56 Cited cited 197×
  18. Minister for the Environment and Heritage v Queensland Conservation Council Inc [2004] FCAFC 190 Cited cited 25×
  19. Brown v Forestry Tasmania (No 4) [2006] FCA 1729 Cited cited 6×
  20. Blue Wedges Inc v Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts [2008] FCA 399 Cited cited 12×
  21. Alexander v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority [2010] FCA 189 Cited cited 24×
  22. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16 Cited cited 1,026×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.