Pinpoint · Judgment search

Quall v Native Title Registrar

[2021] FCA 865

Federal Court of Australia · 29 July 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (19)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Quall v Risk [2001] FCA 378 Cited cited 30×
  2. Risk v Northern Territory of Australia [2006] FCA 404 Cited cited 78×
  3. White Industries Aust Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCA 511 Cited cited 169×
  4. Dowling v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2008] FCA 59 Cited cited 14×
  5. Jefferson Ford Pty Ltd v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited [2008] FCAFC 60 Cited cited 201×
  6. Quall v Northern Territory of Australia [2009] FCA 18 Cited cited 11×
  7. Quall v Northern Territory of Australia [2009] FCAFC 157 Cited cited 10×
  8. Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia [2010] HCA 28 Cited cited 826×
  9. Freeman v Ambulance Victoria [2011] FCA 1141 Cited
  10. Quall v Northern Territory of Australia [2011] FCA 1441 Cited cited 5×
  11. Quall v Northern Territory of Australia [2012] FCA 677 Cited
  12. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis [2013] FCA 641 Cited cited 100×
  13. Krajniw v Newman (No 2) [2015] FCA 673 Cited cited 8×
  14. Sullivan v North West Crewing Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 1130 Cited cited 5×
  15. Keenan v Bundaberg Port Authority [2016] FCA 134 Cited cited 5×
  16. Haque v Jabella Group Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 962 Cited cited 3×
  17. Ferdinands v The State of South Australia (No 2) [2017] FCA 1436 Cited cited 3×
  18. Chandrasekaran v Commonwealth of Australia (No 3) [2020] FCA 1629 Cited cited 27×
  19. Kitoko v University of Technology Sydney [2021] FCA 360 Cited cited 11×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.