Pinpoint · Judgment search

Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd v Minister for Home Affairs

[2011] FCA 225

Federal Court of Australia · 24 March 2011 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2012: 1 citing judgment 2011 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Maxwell-Smith v Donnelly [2012] FCAFC 82 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (20)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Meyers v Casey [1913] HCA 50 Cited cited 45×
  2. R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Ozone Theatres (Aust) Ltd [1949] HCA 33 Cited cited 141×
  3. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33 Applied or followed cited 2,077×
  4. ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd v Fraser (1992) 34 FCR 564 Cited cited 17×
  5. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×
  6. Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×
  7. Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala [2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×
  8. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj [2002] HCA 11 Cited cited 579×
  9. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30 Cited cited 648×
  10. NADH of 2001 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 328 Cited cited 103×
  11. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB [2004] HCA 32 Cited cited 456×
  12. SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCA 24 Cited cited 440×
  13. Bodruddaza v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2007) 228 CLR 65 Cited
  14. Bodruddaza v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2007] HCA 14 Cited cited 70×
  15. SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] HCA 26 Cited cited 615×
  16. SZIGH v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1885 Applied or followed cited 3×
  17. SZGME v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCAFC 91 Cited cited 30×
  18. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIZO [2009] HCA 37 Cited cited 48×
  19. Minister of State for Home Affairs v Siam Polyethylene Co Ltd (2010) 187 FCR 229 Applied or followed
  20. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16 Cited cited 1,026×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.