Pinpoint · Judgment search

SZRDY v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

[2012] FCA 1230

Federal Court of Australia · 7 November 2012 · Official judgment

Cited by 3 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 2

2012: 2 citing judgments 2013: 1 citing judgment 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. SZQQY v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 1231 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  2. SZQZH v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 1251 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  3. SZSLS v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCA 1187 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (12)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Ex parte Bucknell [1936] HCA 67 Cited cited 104×
  2. Ex parte Bucknell [1937] ALR 332 Cited cited 2×
  3. Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 23 IPR 1 Cited cited 4×
  4. Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Cited cited 1,469×
  5. Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc [1991] FCA 844 Cited cited 140×
  6. Little v Victoria [1998] 4 VR 596 Cited cited 30×
  7. Minogue v Williams [2000] FCA 125 Cited cited 139×
  8. Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd (ACN 004 576 103) v Esso Australia Ltd [2000] FCA 1572 Cited cited 265×
  9. Bienstein v Bienstein [2003] HCA 7 Cited cited 237×
  10. Samsung Electronics Co. Limited v Apple Inc. [2011] FCAFC 156 Cited cited 374×
  11. Khondoker v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 654 Applied or followed cited 21×
  12. SZRDY v Minister for Immigration [2012] FMCA 507 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.