Pinpoint · Judgment search

Digital Cinema Network Pty Ltd v Omnilab Media Pty Limited

[2013] FCA 1060

Federal Court of Australia · 17 October 2013 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (14)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. In re Will of FB Gilbert (dec) [1946] NSWStRp 24 Cited cited 347×
  3. Brambles Holdings Ltd v Trade Practices Commission [1979] FCA 80 Cited cited 28×
  4. Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc [1981] HCA 39 Cited cited 623×
  5. Décor Corp Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCA 397 Cited
  6. Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Cited cited 1,469×
  7. Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) [1993] HCA 6 Cited cited 507×
  8. Bright v Femcare Limited [2002] FCAFC 243 Cited cited 49×
  9. Venus Adult Shops Pty Ltd v Fraserside Holdings Ltd (No 2) [2007] FCAFC 41 Cited cited 16×
  10. Lennox v Amcor Limited trading as Amcor Cartonboard (No 2) [2009] FCA 962 Cited cited 5×
  11. Cement Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2010] FCAFC 101 Cited cited 154×
  12. Digital Cinema Network Pty Ltd v Omnilab Media Pty Limited (No 2) [2011] FCA 509 Cited cited 20×
  13. Omnilab Media Pty Limited v Digital Cinema Network Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 166 Cited cited 20×
  14. Digital Cinema Network Pty Limited v Omnilab Media Pty Limited [2013] FCA 497 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.