Pinpoint · Judgment search

MZYUL v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

[2013] FCA 584

Federal Court of Australia · 14 June 2013 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2019: 1 citing judgment 2013 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. EKU17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 782 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (23)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81 Cited cited 1,205×
  3. Stead v State Government Insurance Commission [1986] HCA 54 Cited cited 682×
  4. Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala [2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×
  5. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam [2002] HCA 32 Cited cited 74×
  6. VAAW of 2001 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 202 Cited cited 9×
  7. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6 Cited cited 918×
  8. WAJS v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 139 Cited cited 25×
  9. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB [2004] HCA 32 Cited cited 456×
  10. Applicant NAFF of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] HCA 62 Cited cited 128×
  11. Australian Retailers Association v Reserve Bank of Australia [2005] FCA 1707 (incuding summary) [2005] FCA 1707 Cited cited 96×
  12. VAAD v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 117 Cited cited 119×
  13. Skiwing Pty Ltd v Trust Company of Australia (trading as Stockland Property Management) [2006] NSWCA 276 Cited cited 27×
  14. SZFWB v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 167 Cited cited 7×
  15. Lee v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCAFC 62 Cited cited 30×
  16. SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] HCA 26 Cited cited 615×
  17. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16 Cited cited 1,026×
  18. Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth of Australia [2010] HCA 41 Cited cited 299×
  19. Dunghutti Elders Council (Aboriginal Corporation) RNTBC v Registrar of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporations [2011] FCAFC 88 Cited cited 19×
  20. Minister for Immigration & Citizenship v SZGUR [2011] HCA 1 Cited cited 313×
  21. SZRCI v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) [2012] FCA 1291 Cited cited 3×
  22. Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association v National Retail Association (No 2) [2012] FCA 480 Cited cited 14×
  23. MZYUL v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FMCA 799 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.