Pinpoint · Judgment search

Director of Public Prosecutions v Khoury

[2014] NSWCA 15 ; (2014) 306 ALR 86 ; (2014) 238 A Crim R 251

NSW Court of Appeal · 13 February 2014 · Official judgment

Cited by 12 indexed judgments

All Doubted 1 Cited 11

2014: 1 citing judgment 2015: 2 citing judgments 2017: 1 citing judgment 2018: 1 citing judgment, 1 negative 2019: 2 citing judgments 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 2 citing judgments 2023: 1 citing judgment 2024: 1 citing judgment 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v McKellar (No 6) [2014] NSWSC 1169 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  2. R v MB (No. 4) [2015] NSWSC 593 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  3. Stephen Bell v Commissioner of Police [2015] NSWIC 11 Cited NSWIC · cited 4× · judgment
  4. The Owners – Strata Plan No 82306 v Anderson [2017] NSWCATCD 85 Cited NCAT Consumer and Commercial · cited 8× · judgment
  5. R v Wilson (No 5) [2018] NSWSC 1077 Doubted Supreme Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment
  6. R v Simpkins [2019] NSWDC 75 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  7. R v Wilson (No 6) [2019] NSWSC 529 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  8. Attorney General of New South Wales v WB [2020] NSWCA 7 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  9. Westbury v The Owners – Strata Plan No 64061 [2021] NSWCATEN 3 Cited NCAT Enforcement · cited 10× · judgment
  10. JKL by his tutor Jennifer Thompson v Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network [2021] NSWCA 94 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  11. R v Boujandy (No. 5) [2023] NSWDC 316 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  12. Gerrard Toltz Pty Ltd v City Garden Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2024] NSWCA 232 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 4× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (18)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Julius v Lord Bishop of Oxford (1880) 5 App Cas 214 Cited cited 71×
  2. Julius v Bishop of Oxford (1880) 5 App Cass 214 Cited
  3. Ward v Williams [1955] HCA 4 Cited cited 107×
  4. Finance Facilities Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1971] HCA 12 Cited cited 118×
  5. Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×
  6. REGINA v ORCHER [1999] NSWCCA 356 Cited cited 20×
  7. Samad v District Court of New South Wales [2002] HCA 24 Cited cited 52×
  8. Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] HCA 2 Cited cited 1,335×
  9. Al-Kateb v Godwin [2004] HCA 37 Cited cited 237×
  10. Regina v Graham Edward Mailes [2004] NSWCCA 394 Cited cited 22×
  11. R v Lavender [2005] HCA 37 Cited cited 106×
  12. A.N (No. 2) v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 218 Not followed cited 12×
  13. Einfeld v R [2008] NSWCCA 215 Distinguished cited 30×
  14. Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue [2009] HCA 41 Cited cited 830×
  15. Public Service Association of South Australia Incorporated v Industrial Relations Commission of South Australia [2012] HCA 25 Cited cited 27×
  16. Cooper v The Queen [2012] HCA 50 Cited cited 11×
  17. Certain Lloyd's Underwriters Subscribing to Contract No IH00AAQS v Cross [2012] HCA 56 Cited cited 386×
  18. State of New South Wales v TD [2013] NSWCA 32 Not followed cited 19×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.