Pinpoint · Judgment search

Attorney General for New South Wales v Wright (by his tutor Johnson) (Preliminary)

[2022] NSWSC 537

Supreme Court of NSW · 5 May 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (15)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR NEW SOUTH WALES v TILLMAN [2007] NSWCA 119 Cited cited 214×
  2. Cornwall v. Attorney General for New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 374 Cited cited 237×
  3. Attorney-General of NSW v McGuire (No.2) [2014] NSWSC 288 Cited cited 44×
  4. Lynn v State of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 57 Cited cited 324×
  5. Attorney General of NSW v Doolan by his tutor Jennifer Thompson (No. 2) [2016] NSWSC 107 Cited cited 48×
  6. Attorney General for New South Wales v Kapeen [2017] NSWSC 226 Cited cited 10×
  7. Attorney General of New South Wales v Kereopa (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 928 Cited cited 47×
  8. State of New South Wales v Naaman (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 328 Cited cited 55×
  9. State of New South Wales v Sturgeon [2019] NSWSC 559 Cited cited 42×
  10. State of New South Wales v BP (Preliminary) [2019] NSWSC 699 Cited cited 9×
  11. Attorney General for New South Wales v McGuire by his tutor Thompson [2019] NSWSC 76 Cited cited 14×
  12. Attorney General of New South Wales v WB [2020] NSWCA 7 Cited cited 3×
  13. R v Wright [2020] NSWDC 162 Cited
  14. Attorney General for New South Wales v Randall (Final) [2021] NSWSC 275 Cited cited 3×
  15. State of New South Wales v Hackett (Preliminary) [2022] NSWSC 417 Cited cited 3×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.