Pinpoint · Judgment search

BFF16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

[2018] FCA 1910

Federal Court of Australia · 30 November 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2019: 1 citing judgment 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. BOO17 v Minister for Home Affairs (No 2) [2019] FCA 329 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (20)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1979] AATA 179 Cited cited 660×
  2. Gummow and Bell JJ; Repatriation Commission v O'Brien (1985) 155 CLR 423 Cited cited 5×
  3. Jebb v Repatriation Commission [1988] FCA 105 Cited cited 33×
  4. Randhawa v MILGEA [1994] FCA 1253 Cited cited 448×
  5. Craig v South Australia [1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×
  6. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×
  7. Re The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Durairajasingham [2000] HCA 1 Cited cited 616×
  8. Paul v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1196 Cited cited 126×
  9. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30 Cited cited 1,750×
  10. Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184 Cited cited 654×
  11. Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26 Cited cited 943×
  12. Applicant M31 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural & Indigenous [2004] FCA 533 Cited cited 9×
  13. SHKB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 545 Cited cited 26×
  14. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] HCA 39 Cited cited 538×
  15. Osland v Secretary to the Department of Justice [2010] HCA 24 Cited cited 90×
  16. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT [2013] FCA 317 Cited cited 393×
  17. CQG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 146 Cited cited 243×
  18. BFF16 v Minister for Immigration and Anor [2017] FCCA 3255 Cited
  19. SZUHJ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 331 Cited cited 6×
  20. CWR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 859 Cited cited 16×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.