Pinpoint · Judgment search

Rodgers v R

[2018] NSWCCA 47

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 23 March 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 6 indexed judgments

All Cited 6

2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2023: 3 citing judgments 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Neil Harris (a pseudonym) v Regina [2019] NSWCCA 236 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Amante v R [2020] NSWCCA 34 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 10× · judgment
  3. Hunt v R [2021] NSWCCA 192 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  4. Kochai v R [2023] NSWCCA 116 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 7× · judgment
  5. Wang v R [2023] NSWCCA 208 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  6. R v Burton [2023] NSWCCA 299 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (28)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. R v Pangallo (1991) 56 A Crim R 441 Cited cited 23×
  3. Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57 Applied or followed cited 1,558×
  4. REGINA v DUONG [1999] NSWCCA 353 Cited cited 5×
  5. Regina v Leslie Kalache [2000] NSWCCA 2 Cited cited 108×
  6. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6 Cited cited 918×
  7. Borsa v The Queen [2003] WASCA 254 Cited cited 3×
  8. R v Newman, R v Simpson [2004] NSWCCA 102 Cited cited 51×
  9. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  10. Regina v O'Mally [2005] NSWCCA 166 Cited cited 3×
  11. Baroudi v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 48 Cited cited 19×
  12. R v Nguyen; R v Pham [2010] NSWCCA 238 Cited cited 135×
  13. BUTTON v R [2010] NSWCCA 264 Cited cited 24×
  14. R v Buckskin [2010] SASC 138 Cited cited 2×
  15. Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49 Cited cited 741×
  16. Silas Gordon Haines v R [2012] NSWCCA 238 Cited cited 12×
  17. Abbas, Bodiotis, Taleb and Amoun v R [2013] NSWCCA 115 Cited cited 164×
  18. Delaney v R; R v Delaney [2013] NSWCCA 150 Cited cited 50×
  19. Milsom v R [2014] NSWCCA 142 Cited cited 7×
  20. CL v R [2014] NSWCCA 196 Cited cited 21×
  21. Casey v R [2015] NSWCCA 142 Cited cited 9×
  22. Martinez v R [2015] NSWCCA 5 Cited cited 3×
  23. Usher v R [2016] NSWCCA 276 Cited cited 18×
  24. Shi v R [2017] NSWCCA 126 Cited cited 3×
  25. ZA v R [2017] NSWCCA 132 Cited cited 40×
  26. Owen v R [2017] NSWCCA 54 Cited cited 10×
  27. Hiron v R [2018] NSWCCA 10 Cited cited 8×
  28. Brennan v R [2018] NSWCCA 22 Cited cited 12×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.