Pinpoint · Judgment search

Chelmer NZ Ltd v Financial and Energy Exchange Ltd; No 1

[2019] NSWDC 25

District Court of NSW · 22 February 2019 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (18)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Gordon v MacGregor (1909) 8 CLR 316 Cited cited 16×
  2. Geelong Building Society (in liq) v Encel [1996] 1 VR 594 Cited cited 5×
  3. Patrick v Capital Finance Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 206 Cited cited 5×
  4. R v ACR Roofing Pty Ltd [2004] VSCA 215 Cited
  5. BAULDERSTONE HORNIBROOK ENGINEERING PTY LTD v GORDIAN RUNOFF LTD & ORS [2008] NSWCA 243 Cited cited 93×
  6. Dennis v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2008] NSWCA 37 Cited cited 131×
  7. Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27 Cited cited 1,635×
  8. Hans Pet Constructions Pty Limited v Cassar [2009] NSWCA 230 Cited cited 154×
  9. Halpin & Ors v Lumley General Insurance Ltd [2009] NSWCA 372 Cited cited 64×
  10. Richards v Cornford (No 3) [2010] NSWCA 134 Cited cited 81×
  11. Bi v Mourad [2010] NSWCA 17 Cited cited 101×
  12. Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 11 Cited cited 364×
  13. Bale & Anor v Mills [2011] NSWCA 226 Cited cited 91×
  14. Namberry Craft Pty Ltd v Watson [2011] VSC 136 Cited cited 19×
  15. National Australia Bank Limited v Kim Francis Hunter & Anor (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 763 Cited cited 2×
  16. State of New South Wales v Hunt [2014] NSWCA 47 Cited cited 86×
  17. Kelly v Mina [2014] NSWCA 9 Cited cited 41×
  18. Nadinic v Drinkwater [2017] NSWCA 114 Cited cited 47×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.