Pinpoint · Judgment search

In the matter of Coastal Beaches Pty Ltd

[2019] NSWSC 1681

Supreme Court of NSW · 19 November 2019 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (12)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) [1964] HCA 69 Cited cited 2,085×
  2. En Liquidation v Akhil Holdings Ltd [1990] HCA 11 Cited cited 607×
  3. Agar v Hyde [2000] HCA 41 Cited cited 526×
  4. Gunns Ltd v Marr [2005] VSC 251 Cited cited 97×
  5. Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia [2010] HCA 28 Cited cited 826×
  6. Shaw v State of New South Wales [2012] NSWCA 102 Cited cited 127×
  7. Young v Hones [2013] NSWSC 580 Cited cited 36×
  8. Taylor v Lederman [2013] VSC 99 Cited cited 8×
  9. Ke Qin Ren v Hong Jiang; Yi Cheng Jiang v Wan Ze Property Development (Aust) Pty Ltd (in liq) [2014] NSWCA 388 Applied or followed cited 28×
  10. Shaoyong (David) Guo & Anor v Xinwei Song & Ors; In the matter of SG Capricorn Investments Pty Ltd (subject to deed of company arrangement); Dameng Developments Pty Ltd (subject to deed of company arrangement); and New Mangrove Pty Ltd (subject to a deed of company arrangement) [2018] NSWSC 12 Applied or followed cited 12×
  11. Renshaw v New South Wales Lotteries Corporation Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1954 Applied or followed cited 10×
  12. Ugur v Attorney General for New South Wales [2019] NSWCA 86 Cited cited 37×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.