Pinpoint · Judgment search

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Panthera Finance Pty Ltd

[2020] FCA 340 ; (2020) 143 ACSR 486

Federal Court of Australia · 12 March 2020 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2022: 2 citing judgments 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Touhey v Salini Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 55 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Select AFSL Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 786 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (43)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd [1972] HCA 61 Cited cited 455×
  2. Australian Softwood Forests Pty Ltd v Attorney-General (NSW) [1981] HCA 49 Cited cited 96×
  3. Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission [1992] HCA 10 Cited cited 734×
  4. Tobacco Institute of Australia Ltd v Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc (No 2) [1993] FCA 105 Cited cited 161×
  5. N W Frozen Foods Proprietary Ltd v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission [1996] FCA 1134 Cited cited 507×
  6. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia Inc [1999] FCA 18 Cited cited 147×
  7. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v McCaskey [2000] FCA 1037 Cited cited 21×
  8. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v The Maritime Union of Australia [2001] FCA 1549 Cited cited 51×
  9. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Virgin Mobile Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2002] FCA 1548 Cited cited 84×
  10. Rural Press Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] HCA 75 Cited cited 273×
  11. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  12. Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Axis International Management Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 852 Cited cited 19×
  13. Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39 Cited cited 255×
  14. Stuart v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2010] FCAFC 65 Cited cited 36×
  15. Hogan v Australian Crime Commission [2010] HCA 21 Cited cited 331×
  16. Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45 Applied or followed cited 1,194×
  17. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Sontax Australia (1988) Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1202 Cited cited 20×
  18. McDonald v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2011] FCAFC 29 Applied or followed cited 33×
  19. Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20 Cited cited 319×
  20. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v MSY Technology Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 56 Cited cited 160×
  21. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 12) [2013] FCA 533 Cited cited 33×
  22. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 Applied or followed cited 460×
  23. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1405 Cited cited 93×
  24. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2015] FCA 330 Cited cited 164×
  25. Australian Energy Regulator v Snowy Hydro Limited (No 2) [2015] FCA 58 Cited cited 21×
  26. Queen v Pham [2015] HCA 39 Applied or followed cited 225×
  27. Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46 Cited cited 467×
  28. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Hallmark Computer Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 678 Cited cited 2×
  29. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Valve Corporation (No 5) [2016] FCA 741 Cited cited 56×
  30. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181 Cited cited 230×
  31. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Harrison (No 2) [2017] FCA 182 Cited cited 3×
  32. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jetstar Airways Pty Limited (No 2) [2017] FCA 205 Distinguished cited 14×
  33. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 159 Cited cited 89×
  34. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ACM Group Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 1115 Cited cited 7×
  35. Motorola Solutions, Inc. v Hytera Communications Corporation Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 17 Cited cited 32×
  36. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ACM Group Limited (No 3) [2018] FCA 2059 Cited cited 6×
  37. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ABG Pages Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 764 Cited cited 4×
  38. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73 Distinguished cited 135×
  39. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2018] HCA 3 Cited cited 152×
  40. Department of Health v Peptide Clinics Australia Pty Ltd (2019) 137 ACSR 494 Cited
  41. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cornerstone Investment Aust Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 5) [2019] FCA 1544 Cited cited 16×
  42. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Pattinson [2019] FCA 1654 Cited cited 17×
  43. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Birubi Art Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2019] FCA 996 Cited cited 11×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.