Pinpoint · Judgment search

Connor v State of Queensland (Department of Education and Training) (No 3)

[2020] FCA 455

Federal Court of Australia · 9 April 2020 · Official judgment

Cited by 3 indexed judgments

All Cited 3

2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2025: 1 citing judgment 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Izzo v State of Victoria (Department of Education and Training) [2020] FCA 770 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  2. Connor v State of Queensland (Department of Education and Training) [2021] FCAFC 21 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · judgment
  3. EIX20 v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2025] FCA 28 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (11)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34 Cited cited 3,164×
  2. Purvis v New South Wales (Department of Education and Training) [2003] HCA 62 Cited cited 351×
  3. Qantas Airways Limited v Gama [2008] FCAFC 69 Cited cited 121×
  4. Walker v State of Victoria [2011] FCA 258 Cited cited 30×
  5. Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 11 Cited cited 364×
  6. Walker v State of Victoria [2012] FCAFC 38 Cited cited 33×
  7. Kiefel v State of Victoria [2013] FCA 1398 Cited cited 12×
  8. Watts v Australian Postal Corporation [2014] FCA 370 Cited cited 37×
  9. Sklavos v Australasian College of Dermatologists [2017] FCAFC 128 Cited cited 23×
  10. Varasdi v State of Victoria [2018] FCA 1655 Cited cited 6×
  11. Tropoulos v Journey Lawyers Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 436 Cited cited 11×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.