Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Riley, Christopher

[2020] NSWCCA 283

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 4 November 2020 · Official judgment

Cited by 8 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 2 Cited 6

2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 2 citing judgments 2023: 5 citing judgments 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Itani [2021] NSWDC 26 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  2. Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Presnell [2022] NSWCCA 146 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  3. JW v R [2022] NSWCCA 206 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  4. Fantakis v R [2023] NSWCCA 3 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 10× · judgment
  5. Re referral by Executive Director, Local Government, under s 440J of the Local Government Act 1993, concerning Mr Funnell, a former Councillor [2023] NSWCATOD 17 Cited NCAT Occupational · judgment
  6. R v Clarke [2023] NSWCCA 123 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  7. Dedeoglu v R [2023] NSWCCA 126 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  8. Mann v R [2023] NSWCCA 256 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (36)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. Shrimpton v The Commonwealth [1945] HCA 4 Cited cited 35×
  3. Bunning v Cross [1978] HCA 22 Cited cited 116×
  4. Warren v Coombes [1979] HCA 9 Cited cited 595×
  5. Norbis v Norbis [1986] HCA 17 Cited cited 255×
  6. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21 Cited cited 971×
  7. Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission [2000] HCA 47 Cited cited 399×
  8. R v Fletcher [2005] NSWCCA 338 Cited cited 86×
  9. Vickers v R [2006] NSWCCA 60 Cited cited 26×
  10. Em v The Queen [2007] HCA 46 Cited cited 69×
  11. Norvenska v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2007] NSWCCA 158 Cited cited 20×
  12. R v CAMILLERI [2007] NSWCCA 36 Cited cited 17×
  13. Dwyer v Calco Timbers Pty Ltd [2008] HCA 13 Cited cited 70×
  14. Regina v ARVIDSON [2008] NSWCCA 135 Cited cited 5×
  15. AW v REGINA [2009] NSWCCA 1 Cited cited 14×
  16. Fleming v R [2009] NSWCCA 233 Cited cited 16×
  17. Director of Public Prosecutions v MD [2010] VSCA 233 Cited cited 3×
  18. RILEY v R [2011] NSWCCA 238 Cited cited 8×
  19. DAO v R [2011] NSWCCA 63 Cited cited 137×
  20. Director of Public Prosecutions v Marijancevic [2011] VSCA 355 Cited cited 10×
  21. McCartney v The Queen [2012] VSCA 268 Cited cited 4×
  22. Murdoch v R [2013] VSCA 272 Overruled or disapproved cited 3×
  23. R v Ali [2015] NSWCCA 72 Cited cited 3×
  24. Karam v R [2015] VSCA 50 Cited
  25. IMM v The Queen [2016] HCA 14 Cited cited 250×
  26. R (Cth) v Rapolti; R (Cth) v Russell; R (Cth) v Speedy Corporation Pty Limited [2016] NSWCCA 264 Cited cited 4×
  27. R v GM [2016] NSWCCA 78 Overruled or disapproved cited 5×
  28. The Queen v Dickman [2017] HCA 24 Cited cited 21×
  29. BM v R [2017] NSWCCA 253 Overruled or disapproved cited 5×
  30. R v Grech; R v Kadir [2017] NSWCCA 288 Cited cited 5×
  31. CA v R [2017] NSWCCA 324 Cited cited 8×
  32. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30 Cited cited 620×
  33. Queen v Bauer [2018] HCA 40 Cited cited 165×
  34. Brown, Michael John v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2018] NSWCCA 94 Cited cited 5×
  35. Slater v R [2019] VSCA 213 Cited
  36. Kadir v The Queen [2020] HCA 1 Cited cited 29×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.