Pinpoint · Judgment search

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v La Trobe Financial Asset Management Ltd

[2021] FCA 1417 ; (2021) 158 ACSR 363

Federal Court of Australia · 26 November 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 10 indexed judgments

All Cited 10

2022: 3 citing judgments 2023: 4 citing judgments 2024: 3 citing judgments 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Ripani v Century Legend Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 242 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  2. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Samsung Electronics Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 875 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  3. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Uber B.V. [2022] FCA 1466 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  4. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2023] FCA 256 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  5. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Meta Platforms Inc [2023] FCA 842 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  6. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2023] FCA 1150 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  7. Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave Funding) Corporation v Payne (Qld) Pty Ltd ATF the Indamine Unit Trust trading as Undamine Industries [2023] FCA 1681 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  8. Electoral Commissioner v McQuestin [2024] FCA 287 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  9. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Mercer Superannuation (Australia) Limited [2024] FCA 850 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  10. Touch for Health Pty Ltd as Trustee for Knight Superannuation Fund v Property Mentors Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2024] FCA 1381 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (43)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd [1972] HCA 61 Cited cited 455×
  2. Taco Company of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd [1982] FCA 170 Cited cited 315×
  3. Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd [1982] HCA 44 Cited cited 513×
  4. Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd [1990] FCA 762 Cited cited 132×
  5. Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission [1992] HCA 10 Cited cited 734×
  6. N W Frozen Foods Proprietary Ltd v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission [1996] FCA 1134 Cited cited 507×
  7. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd & Ors [1997] FCA 450 Cited cited 163×
  8. Campomar Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Limited [2000] HCA 12 Cited cited 451×
  9. ASIC v Adler & 4 Ors [2002] NSWSC 483 Cited cited 174×
  10. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Signature Security Group Pty Limited [2003] FCA 3 Cited cited 24×
  11. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Danoz Direct Pty Ltd (ACN 003 546 709) [2003] FCA 881 Cited cited 34×
  12. Rural Press Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] HCA 75 Cited cited 273×
  13. IMF (Australia) Ltd v Sons Of Gwalia Ltd (Administrator Appointed) ACN 008 994 287 [2004] FCA 1390 Cited cited 47×
  14. National Exchange Pty Ltd (ACN 006 079 974) v Australian Securities & Investments Commission [2004] FCAFC 90 Cited cited 90×
  15. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  16. Downey v Carlson Hotels Asia Pacific Pty Ltd [2005] QCA 199 Cited cited 35×
  17. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2006] FCA 1730 Cited cited 73×
  18. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dukemaster Pty Ltd (ACN 050 275 226) [2009] FCA 682 Cited cited 99×
  19. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Corporation Limited [2010] FCA 790 Cited cited 74×
  20. Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39 Cited cited 255×
  21. Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45 Cited cited 1,194×
  22. McDonald v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2011] FCAFC 29 Cited cited 33×
  23. Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20 Cited cited 319×
  24. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v MSY Technology Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 56 Cited cited 160×
  25. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 Cited cited 460×
  26. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1405 Cited cited 93×
  27. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GE Capital Finance Australia, in the matter of GE Capital Finance Australia [2014] FCA 701 Cited cited 34×
  28. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v EnergyAustralia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 274 Cited cited 24×
  29. Selig v Wealthsure Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 18 Cited cited 32×
  30. Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46 Cited cited 467×
  31. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Valve Corporation (No 3) [2016] FCA 196 Cited cited 58×
  32. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hillside (Australia New Media) Pty Ltd trading as Bet365 (No 2) [2016] FCA 698 Cited cited 78×
  33. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181 Applied or followed cited 230×
  34. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 113 Cited cited 229×
  35. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac Banking Corporation (No 2) [2018] FCA 751 Cited cited 57×
  36. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73 Cited cited 135×
  37. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Gallop International Group Pty Ltd, in the matter of Gallop International Group Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1514 Cited cited 9×
  38. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Dover Financial Advisers Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1932 Cited cited 20×
  39. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Australia Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 676 Cited cited 8×
  40. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v MLC Nominees Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1306 Cited cited 33×
  41. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 130 Cited cited 56×
  42. Trivago N.V. v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2020] FCAFC 185 Cited cited 15×
  43. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2021] FCAFC 49 Cited cited 60×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.