Pinpoint · Judgment search

Davidson v Suncorp-Metway Limited (No 5)

[2021] FCA 256

Federal Court of Australia · 23 March 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (21)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 Cited cited 444×
  2. Registrar v Unnamed Respondent (1994) 234 FLR 248 Cited
  3. Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11 Cited cited 2,226×
  4. FPM Constructions v Council of the City of Blue Mountains [2005] NSWCA 340 Applied or followed cited 121×
  5. Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority (No 2) [2005] VSCA 298 Cited cited 250×
  6. Probiotec Limited v The University of Melbourne [2008] FCAFC 5 Cited cited 57×
  7. BHPB Freight Pty Ltd v Cosco Oceania Chartering Pty Ltd (No 4) [2009] FCA 1448 Cited cited 5×
  8. Ford Motor Company of Australia Ltd v Lo Presti [2009] WASCA 115 Cited cited 6×
  9. Jack Brabham Engines Limited v Beare [2010] FCA 1096 Cited cited 2×
  10. Civil Properties Pty Ltd v Miluc Pty Ltd [2011] WASCA 195 Applied or followed cited 5×
  11. Goritsas & Ors v Barakat & Ors [2012] NSWSC 36 Cited cited 4×
  12. Bitzer Australia Pty Ltd v Japp [2014] FCA 1040 Cited
  13. Mitry Lawyers v Barnden [2014] FCA 918 Cited cited 17×
  14. WA Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Hampton Transport Services [2017] FCA 1310 Applied or followed cited 2×
  15. Young v Hughes Trueman Pty Ltd (No 4) [2017] FCA 456 Cited cited 12×
  16. Barkhazen v Conair Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 992 Cited cited 2×
  17. Strzelecki Holdings Pty Ltd v Jorgensen [2019] WASCA 96 Cited cited 5×
  18. Davidson v Suncorp-Metway Limited (No 3) [2020] FCA 1593 Cited cited 4×
  19. Davidson v Suncorp-Metway Limited [2020] FCA 795 Cited cited 3×
  20. Dyczynski v Gibson [2020] FCAFC 120 Cited cited 60×
  21. Davidson v Suncorp-Metway Limited (No 4) [2021] FCA 25 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.