Pinpoint · Judgment search

Edmonds v R

[2022] NSWCCA 103

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 25 May 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 9 indexed judgments

All Distinguished 2 Applied or followed 1 Cited 6

2022: 2 citing judgments 2023: 2 citing judgments 2024: 5 citing judgments, 2 negative 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Boyd [2022] NSWCCA 120 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  2. Wass v R [2022] NSWCCA 143 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 8× · judgment
  3. Richards v R [2023] NSWCCA 264 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  4. Baines v Rex [2023] NSWCCA 302 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  5. Issac v R [2024] NSWCCA 2 Distinguished NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  6. ET v R [2024] NSWCCA 131 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  7. Keen v R [2024] NSWCCA 157 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  8. Environment Protection Authority v Calleija; Environment Protection Authority v Budget Waste Recycling Pty Ltd [2024] NSWLEC 119 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · judgment
  9. Da Silva v R [2024] NSWCCA 216 Distinguished NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (27)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×
  2. Pantorno v The Queen [1989] HCA 18 Cited cited 71×
  3. Parker v Director of Public Prosecutions (1992) 28 NSWLR 282 Cited cited 121×
  4. R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 Applied or followed cited 274×
  5. R v Bourchas [2002] NSWCCA 373 Applied or followed cited 19×
  6. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6 Cited cited 918×
  7. Johnson v The Queen [2004] HCA 15 Cited cited 429×
  8. Regina v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131 Cited cited 907×
  9. MULATO v REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 282 Cited cited 404×
  10. Baroudi v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 48 Cited cited 19×
  11. REGINA v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115 Cited cited 143×
  12. BUTTON v R [2010] NSWCCA 264 Cited cited 24×
  13. Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 Cited cited 1,670×
  14. Weir v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 123 Cited cited 26×
  15. R v Millwood [2012] NSWCCA 2 Cited cited 166×
  16. Agius v The Queen [2013] HCA 27 Distinguished cited 34×
  17. Farkas v R [2014] NSWCCA 141 Applied or followed cited 28×
  18. Nguyen v The Queen [2016] HCA 17 Cited cited 71×
  19. The Queen v Kilic [2016] HCA 48 Cited cited 168×
  20. Amiri v R [2017] NSWCCA 157 Cited cited 3×
  21. Kristensen v R [2018] NSWCCA 189 Cited cited 26×
  22. Greentree v R [2018] NSWCCA 227 Cited cited 21×
  23. R v Edmonds [2020] NSWDC 687 Cited
  24. Ke v R [2021] NSWCCA 177 Cited cited 11×
  25. BS v R [2021] NSWCCA 39 Applied or followed cited 6×
  26. Gould v R; R v Gould [2021] NSWCCA 92 Cited cited 10×
  27. Lloyd v R [2022] NSWCCA 18 Cited cited 76×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.