Pinpoint · Judgment search

Cirrus Real Time Processing Systems Pty Limited v Jet Aviation Australia Pty Ltd

[2023] NSWSC 464

Supreme Court of NSW · 5 May 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2023: 1 citing judgment 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Cirrus Real Time Processing Systems Pty Ltd v Jet Aviation Australia Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 280 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 5× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (8)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Pioneer Shipping Ltd v BTP Tioxide Ltd [1982] AC 724 Cited cited 29×
  2. Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Limited v Gardiner [2008] HCA 57 Cited cited 250×
  3. County Securities Pty Limited v Challenger Group Holdings Pty Limited & Anor [2008] NSWCA 193 Cited cited 104×
  4. Franklins Pty Ltd v Metcash Trading Ltd [2009] NSWCA 407 Cited cited 318×
  5. Cottonex Anstalt v Patriot Spinning Mills Ltd [2014] EWHC 236 Cited cited 2×
  6. Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd [2014] HCA 7 Cited cited 680×
  7. Johnston v Brightstars Holding Company Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 150 Cited cited 50×
  8. Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 37 Cited cited 531×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.