Pinpoint · Judgment search

Davis v Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia (No 1)

[2009] FCA 562

Federal Court of Australia · 29 May 2009 · Official judgment

Cited by 5 indexed judgments

All Cited 5

2009: 2 citing judgments 2010: 2 citing judgments 2011: 1 citing judgment 2009 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Davis v Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia (No 2) [2009] FCA 589 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  2. Davis v Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia [2009] FCA 729 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Davis v Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia (No 3) [2010] FCA 69 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  4. Medich v Bentley-Smythe Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 494 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 24× · judgment
  5. Davis v Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 9 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 23× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (22)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Le Mesurier v Connor [1929] HCA 41 Cited cited 39×
  2. Adams v Chas S Watson Pty Ltd [1938] HCA 37 Cited cited 24×
  3. Peacock v Newtown Marrickville and General Co-operative Building Society (No 4) Ltd [1943] HCA 13 Cited cited 27×
  4. Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd [1968] HCA 1 Cited cited 479×
  5. American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] UKHL 1 Applied or followed cited 110×
  6. Russell v Russell (1976) 9 ALR 103 Cited cited 3×
  7. Russell v Russell [1976] HCA 23 Cited cited 131×
  8. Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia [1986] HCA 58 Cited cited 401×
  9. Kolback Securities Ltd v Epoch Mining NL (1987) 8 NSWLR 533 Cited cited 231×
  10. Ex parte Townsend (1995) 130 ALR 163 Cited cited 3×
  11. Ex parte Townsend (1995) 69 ALJR 647 Cited cited 3×
  12. Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [1995] HCA 10 Cited cited 178×
  13. Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (1996) 138 ALR 577 Cited cited 8×
  14. Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [1996] HCA 24 Cited cited 288×
  15. Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia [1998] HCA 30 Applied or followed cited 431×
  16. Attorney-General (Cth) v Breckler [1999] HCA 28 Cited cited 139×
  17. Ly v Jenkins [2001] FCA 1640 Applied or followed cited 15×
  18. Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 63 Cited cited 455×
  19. Luton v Lessels [2002] HCA 13 Applied or followed cited 45×
  20. Whittaker v Child Support Registrar [2003] FCAFC 114 Applied or followed cited 5×
  21. Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [2006] HCA 46 Cited cited 822×
  22. Sebel Furniture Limited v Acoustic & Felts Pty Limited [2009] FCA 6 Applied or followed cited 4×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.