Pinpoint · Judgment search

Levinge on behalf of the Gold Coast Native Title Group v State of Queensland

[2013] FCA 634

Federal Court of Australia · 3 June 2013 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 3

2013: 1 citing judgment 2015: 1 citing judgment 2016: 1 citing judgment 2017: 1 citing judgment 2013 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Levinge on behalf of the Gold Coast Native Title Group v State of Queensland (No 3) [2013] FCA 1154 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. Hill on behalf of the Yirendali People Core Country Claim v State of Queensland [2015] FCA 300 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  3. Murray on behalf of the Yilka Native Title Claimants v State of Western Australia (No 5) [2016] FCA 752 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 22× · judgment
  4. Agius v State of South Australia (No 4) [2017] FCA 361 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 9× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (20)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Hampton (the Ship Money Case) (1637) 3 State Trials 826 Applied or followed
  2. Blair v Curran [1939] HCA 23 Cited cited 473×
  3. SCI Operations Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission [1984] FCA 52 Applied or followed cited 24×
  4. P E Bakers Pty Ltd v Yehuda (1988) 13 NSWLR 427 Applied or followed
  5. Lenijamar Pty Ltd v AGC (Advances) Ltd [1990] FCA 520 Cited cited 129×
  6. Walton v Gardiner [1993] HCA 77 Applied or followed cited 679×
  7. (1994) 181 CLR 40 Applied or followed cited 2×
  8. Shin Kobe Maru' v Empire Shipping Co Inc [1994] HCA 54 Cited cited 357×
  9. Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11 Applied or followed cited 2,226×
  10. Fejo v Northern Territory [1998] HCA 58 Cited cited 128×
  11. Ward v State of Western Australia [1999] FCA 580 Applied or followed cited 31×
  12. Yanner v Eaton [1999] HCA 53 Cited cited 110×
  13. State of Western Australia v Ward [2000] FCA 191 Cited cited 114×
  14. Wilson v Anderson [2002] HCA 29 Applied or followed cited 99×
  15. Daniel v State of Western Australia [2004] FCA 849 Cited cited 22×
  16. De Rose v State of South Australia (No 2) [2005] FCAFC 137 Applied or followed cited 33×
  17. Birri-Gubba (Cape Upstart) People v State of Queensland [2008] FCA 659 Applied or followed cited 9×
  18. Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27 Cited cited 1,635×
  19. Jeffery & Katauskas Pty Limited v SST Consulting Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 43 Applied or followed cited 119×
  20. Levinge on behalf of the Gold Coast Native Title Group v State of Queensland [2012] FCA 1321 Cited cited 12×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.