Pinpoint · Judgment search

Alpha v R

[2013] NSWCCA 292

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 28 November 2013 · Official judgment

Cited by 11 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 4 Cited 7

2013: 2 citing judgments 2014: 4 citing judgments 2023: 5 citing judgments 2013 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Golossian v R [2013] NSWCCA 311 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 11× · judgment
  2. Outram v R [2013] NSWCCA 329 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  3. Carlton v R [2014] NSWCCA 14 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 15× · judgment
  4. Miles v R [2014] NSWCCA 72 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  5. WA v R [2014] NSWCCA 92 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  6. Ivory v R [2014] NSWCCA 181 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  7. R v Lauren Cranston [2023] NSWSC 454 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 8× · judgment
  8. R v Patrick Willmott [2023] NSWSC 474 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment
  9. R v Dev Menon [2023] NSWSC 768 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 6× · judgment
  10. R v Adam Cranston [2023] NSWSC 1004 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 8× · judgment
  11. R v Onley [2023] NSWSC 1008 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (15)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Lowe v The Queen [1984] HCA 46 Cited cited 738×
  2. R v Spizzerri [2001] VSCA 49 Cited cited 5×
  3. Regina v Nguyen; Regina v Pham; Regina v Vu; Regina v To [2005] NSWCCA 362 Cited cited 37×
  4. Tatana v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 398 Cited cited 57×
  5. Regina v Rick Barry Swan [2006] NSWCCA 47 Cited cited 58×
  6. Tyler v Regina; Regina v Chalmers [2007] NSWCCA 247 Cited cited 125×
  7. Pavicevic v R [2010] ACTCA 25 Cited cited 6×
  8. Gill v R [2010] NSWCCA 236 Cited cited 28×
  9. Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 Cited cited 1,670×
  10. Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49 Cited cited 741×
  11. McCraw v R [2011] NSWCCA 162 Cited cited 4×
  12. Dwayhi v R; Bechara v R [2011] NSWCCA 67 Cited cited 35×
  13. Sinkovich v Attorney General of New South Wales [2013] NSWCA 383 Applied or followed cited 104×
  14. Winter v R [2013] NSWCCA 231 Cited cited 5×
  15. Abdul v R [2013] NSWCCA 247 Applied or followed cited 46×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.