Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Simmons; R v Moore (No 2)

[2015] NSWSC 143 ; (2015) 249 A Crim R 82

Supreme Court of NSW · 4 March 2015 · Official judgment

Cited by 9 indexed judgments

All Cited 9

2015: 7 citing judgments 2021: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2015 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Simmons; R v Moore (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 189 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 11× · judgment
  2. R v Simmons; R v Moore (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 259 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 42× · judgment
  3. R v Simmons (No 5) (Non-Publication Orders) [2015] NSWSC 333 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment
  4. R v Simmons (No 6) [2015] NSWSC 418 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  5. R v Simmons (No 7) [2015] NSWSC 574 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 6× · judgment
  6. R v Simmons (No 9) [2015] NSWSC 718 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  7. R v Moore [2015] NSWSC 1263 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 23× · judgment
  8. R v Kilincer (No. 2) [2021] NSWSC 829 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  9. R v Rumsby [2023] NSWSC 229 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (33)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Cleland v The Queen [1982] HCA 67 Cited cited 44×
  2. Foster v The Queen [1983] HCA 80 Cited
  3. Duke v The Queen [1989] HCA 1 Cited
  4. Doney v The Queen [1990] HCA 51 Cited cited 244×
  5. Pollard v The Queen [1992] HCA 69 Cited cited 20×
  6. R v Barbouttis (1995) 37 NSWLR 256 Cited cited 8×
  7. R v Swaffield [1998] HCA 1 Cited cited 107×
  8. R v McCOY [2001] NSWCCA 255 Cited cited 3×
  9. R v Phan [2001] NSWCCA 29 Cited cited 32×
  10. R v Dalley [2002] NSWCCA 284 Cited cited 34×
  11. R v Sophear Em [2003] NSWCCA 374 Cited cited 38×
  12. Ostrowski v Palmer [2004] HCA 30 Cited cited 60×
  13. Regina v MM [2004] NSWCCA 364 Cited cited 12×
  14. R v Cook [2004] NSWCCA 52 Cited cited 95×
  15. R v Fletcher [2005] NSWCCA 338 Cited cited 86×
  16. Regina v Linard SHAMOUIL [2006] NSWCCA 112 Not followed cited 143×
  17. Tofilau v The Queen [2007] HCA 39 Cited cited 21×
  18. Em v The Queen [2007] HCA 46 Cited cited 69×
  19. Pavitt v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 88 Cited cited 21×
  20. R v Keenan MUNDINE [2008] NSWCCA 55 Cited cited 19×
  21. Dowe v R [2009] NSWCCA 23 Cited cited 4×
  22. Donai v R [2011] NSWCCA 173 Cited cited 5×
  23. KMJ v State of Tasmania [2011] TASCCA 7 Applied or followed cited 2×
  24. DSJ v R; NS v R [2012] NSWCCA 9 Cited cited 74×
  25. Dupas v The Queen [2012] VSCA 328 Not followed cited 34×
  26. R v XY [2013] NSWCCA 121 Cited cited 85×
  27. GEDEON, Gilbert v R [2013] NSWCCA 257 Cited cited 26×
  28. R v Burton [2013] NSWCCA 335 Cited cited 48×
  29. R v LDV (No. 2) [2013] NSWDC 215 Cited cited 4×
  30. R v Kristi Anne Abrahams [2013] NSWSC 952 Cited cited 9×
  31. R v Cowan [2013] QSC 337 Cited cited 3×
  32. R v DF [2014] NSWDC 149 Cited cited 2×
  33. R v Simmons (No 5) (Non-Publication Orders) [2015] NSWSC 333 Cited cited 4×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.