Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Singh (No 8)

[2023] NSWSC 51

Supreme Court of NSW · 10 February 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2025: 1 citing judgment 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Dillon; R v Locke; R v Taylor [2025] NSWSC 42 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (14)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Allerton v Director of Public Prosecutions (1991) 24 NSWLR 550 Cited cited 84×
  2. Gwozdecky v Director of Public Prosecutions (1992) 65 A Crim R 160 Cited cited 22×
  3. Regina v Bernard Lawrence JOHNSTON [2000] NSWCCA 197 Cited cited 66×
  4. Cornwell v The Queen [2007] HCA 12 Cited cited 53×
  5. Mordaunt v Director of Public Prosecutions & Anor [2007] NSWCA 121 Cited cited 93×
  6. Chahal v Director of Public Prosecutions [2008] NSWCA 152 Cited cited 16×
  7. R v Moore [2015] NSWSC 1263 Cited cited 23×
  8. R v Kulwinder Singh (No 1) [2019] NSWSC 1000 Cited
  9. R v Singh (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1410 Cited
  10. R v Singh (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 1911 Cited cited 4×
  11. R v Singh (No 6) [2021] NSWSC 213 Cited
  12. R v Singh (No 7) [2021] NSWSC 267 Cited
  13. R v Singh (No 4) [2021] NSWSC 75 Cited cited 10×
  14. R v Singh (No 5) [2021] NSWSC 76 Cited cited 3×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.