Pinpoint · Judgment search

Productivity Partners Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia

[2018] FCA 1562

Federal Court of Australia · 19 October 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2023: 1 citing judgment 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. AZC20 v Commonwealth of Australia [2023] FCA 845 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (13)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Mallinson v Scottish Australian Investment Co Ltd [1920] HCA 51 Cited cited 33×
  2. Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Mayer [1985] HCA 70 Cited cited 57×
  3. Peverill v Meir (1990) 95 ALR 401 Cited cited 4×
  4. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×
  5. Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy [1996] HCA 44 Cited cited 100×
  6. Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd [1997] HCA 3 Cited cited 298×
  7. Commonwealth v SCI Operations Pty Ltd [1998] HCA 20 Cited cited 115×
  8. Malika Holdings Pty Ltd v Stretton [2001] HCA 14 Cited cited 52×
  9. Re Heerey; Ex parte Heinrich [2001] HCA 74 Cited cited 7×
  10. Griffith University v Tang [2005] HCA 7 Cited cited 135×
  11. Perdikaris v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2008] FCAFC 186 Cited cited 5×
  12. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Broadbeach Properties Pty Ltd [2008] HCA 41 Cited cited 130×
  13. Pape v Commissioner of Taxation (2009) 257 ALR 1 Cited cited 4×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.