Pinpoint · Judgment search

GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Limited (No 3)

[2018] FCA 183

Federal Court of Australia · 28 February 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2024: 1 citing judgment 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Masters v Lombe (liquidator), in the matter of Babcock & Brown Limited (in liq) (Lump Sum Costs) [2024] FCA 1336 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (16)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Applied or followed cited 778×
  2. Cutts v Head [1983] EWCA Civ 8 Applied or followed cited 52×
  3. Beach Petroleum NL & Anor v Johnson, M.K. & Ors [1995] FCA 350 Applied or followed cited 330×
  4. Sony Entertainment (Australia) Limited v Smith [2005] FCA 228 Cited cited 146×
  5. Seven Network Limited v News Limited [2007] FCA 2059 Applied or followed cited 43×
  6. Gryst v Dromana Estate Limited (No 2) [2008] FCA 1499 Cited
  7. Diakyne Pty Limited v Ralph (No 2) [2009] FCA 780 Cited
  8. Alexander v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority (No 3) [2010] FCA 506 Cited cited 13×
  9. Kazar (Liquidator) v Kargarian; In the Matter of Frontier Architects Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2011] FCAFC 136 Cited cited 100×
  10. De Brett Seafood Pty Limited v Qantas Airways Limited (No 7) [2015] FCA 979 Applied or followed cited 3×
  11. Hudson v Sigalla (No 2) [2017] FCA 339 Cited cited 22×
  12. Clipsal Australia Pty Ltd v Clipso Electrical Pty Ltd (No 4) [2017] FCA 436 Cited cited 14×
  13. Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 146 Cited cited 79×
  14. LFDB v SM (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 207 Cited cited 40×
  15. GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 1 Cited cited 9×
  16. Laminar Air Flow Pty Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks (No 2) [2018] FCA 38 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.