Pinpoint · Judgment search

Coshott v Burke (No 2)

[2018] FCAFC 81

Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · 25 May 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 11 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 10

2018: 3 citing judgments 2019: 2 citing judgments 2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 3 citing judgments 2024: 2 citing judgments 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Fewin Pty Limited v Prentice [2018] FCA 852 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  2. Webb v GetSwift Limited (No 3) [2018] FCA 1133 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  3. Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd (No 7) [2018] FCA 1217 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  4. Coshott v Burke (No 3) [2019] FCAFC 23 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 5× · judgment
  5. Sandalwood Properties Ltd (Subject to a Deed of Company Arrangement) v Huntley Management Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 647 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  6. Billingsley v Napoli, in the matter of Biometric Identity Systems Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) (No 2) [2021] FCA 526 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  7. Sackl v Auslink Investment Co. Associates Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 402 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  8. Frigger v Trenfield (No 12) [2022] FCA 900 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  9. Knowles v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2022] FCA 1003 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  10. Sharif v Vitruvian Investments Pty Ltd (No 5) [2024] FCA 134 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  11. Stasiuk v Monster Energy Au Pty Ltd (No 3) [2024] FCA 1052 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (23)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. New Pinnacle Group Silver Mining Co v Luhrig Coal and Ore Dressing Appliances Co (1902) 2 SR (NSW) 50 Cited cited 11×
  2. McCullum v Ifield [1969] 2 NSWR 329 Cited cited 21×
  3. Beach Petroleum NL & Anor v Johnson, M.K. & Ors [1995] FCA 350 Applied or followed cited 330×
  4. Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11 Cited cited 2,226×
  5. North Australian Aboriginal Legal Aid Service Inc v Hugh Burton Bradley (No 2) [2002] FCA 564 Cited cited 3×
  6. Harrison & Anor v Schipp [2002] NSWCA 213 Cited cited 405×
  7. WENTWORTH v ROGERS; WENTWORTH & RUSSO v ROGERS [2006] NSWCA 145 Cited cited 107×
  8. Seven Network Limited v News Limited [2007] FCA 2059 Cited cited 43×
  9. Salfinger v Niugini Mining (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 5) [2008] FCA 1119 Cited cited 11×
  10. Coshott v Woollahra Municipal Council [2008] NSWCA 176 Cited cited 15×
  11. Telstra Corporation Limited v Phone Directories Company Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1463 Cited cited 6×
  12. Olivaylle Pty Ltd v Flottweg GMBH & Co KGAA (No 6) [2011] FCA 688 Cited cited 5×
  13. Levy v Bablis [2012] NSWSC 661 Cited cited 2×
  14. Short v Crawley (No. 45) [2013] NSWSC 1541 Cited cited 41×
  15. Simone Starr-Diamond v Talus Diamond (No. 4) [2013] NSWSC 811 Cited cited 49×
  16. Bobb v Wombat Securities Pty Ltd & Ors (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 863 Cited cited 62×
  17. Bayley & Associates Pty Ltd v DBR Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 346 Cited cited 20×
  18. eInduct Systems Pty Ltd v 3D Safety Services Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 284 Cited cited 28×
  19. Hancock v Rinehart (Lump sum costs) [2015] NSWSC 1640 Cited cited 55×
  20. Hudson v Sigalla [2016] FCA 1204 Applied or followed cited 9×
  21. Fewin Pty Ltd v Burke (No 3) [2017] FCA 693 Cited cited 24×
  22. Coshott v Burke [2017] FCAFC 230 Cited cited 4×
  23. Cristovao v Tan & Tan Lawyers Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 41 Cited cited 12×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.