Pinpoint · Judgment search

JE v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services

[2019] NSWCA 162

NSW Court of Appeal · 3 July 2019 · Official judgment

Cited by 6 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 5

2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 2 citing judgments 2022: 2 citing judgments 2023: 1 citing judgment 2019 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Pope v Telstra Corporation Limited [2019] NSWCATAP 178 Cited NCAT Appeal Panel · judgment
  2. JE v Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice [2020] NSWCA 123 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  3. JE v Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 243 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  4. JE v Central Coast Local Health District & Ors [2022] NSWDC 31 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  5. JE v Central Coast Local Health District [2022] NSWCA 125 Applied or followed NSW Court of Appeal · judgment
  6. M v Department of Communities and Justice; M v Family and Community Services [2023] NSWDC 485 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (20)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Ozone Theatres (Aust) Ltd (1949) 78 CLR 359 Cited
  3. R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Ozone Theatres (Aust) Ltd [1949] HCA 33 Cited cited 141×
  4. Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1960) 161 CLR 141 Applied or followed
  5. Stead v State Government Insurance Commission [1986] HCA 54 Cited cited 682×
  6. Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala [2000] HCA 57 Applied or followed cited 962×
  7. Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte HB [2001] HCA 34 Cited cited 36×
  8. Druett v. Director-General of Community Services [2001] NSWCA 126 Cited cited 21×
  9. X v Director-General of the Department of Community Services [2001] NSWCA 413 Cited cited 14×
  10. TOMKO v PALASTY (NO. 2) [2007] NSWCA 369 Cited cited 482×
  11. Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales [2010] HCA 1 Cited cited 821×
  12. Blackmore v Browne; Kara Kar Holdings Pty Ltd v Blackmore [2011] NSWCA 114 Cited cited 17×
  13. Jaycar Pty Limited v Lombardo [2011] NSWCA 284 Applied or followed cited 250×
  14. Muldoon v Church of England Children's Homes Burwood [2011] NSWCA 46 Cited cited 44×
  15. Rodger v De Gelder & Anor [2011] NSWCA 97 Applied or followed cited 88×
  16. Be Financial Pty Ltd as Trustee for Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 Applied or followed cited 303×
  17. Colquhoun v District Court of New South Wales [2014] NSWCA 460 Cited cited 9×
  18. Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services v Smith [2017] NSWCA 206 Applied or followed cited 191×
  19. DC v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services & Ors [2017] NSWCA 225 Cited cited 6×
  20. PPK Willoughby Pty Ltd v Baird [2019] NSWCA 48 Cited cited 77×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.