Pinpoint · Judgment search

Power Ledger Pty Ltd v Griffiths

[2021] FCA 624 ; (2021) 308 IR 147

Federal Court of Australia · 9 June 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 3 indexed judgments

All Cited 3

2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2024: 1 citing judgment 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Porter [2022] FCA 336 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  2. Monash Health v Singh [2023] FCAFC 166 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 21× · judgment
  3. China Australia Travel Group Pty Ltd v Yang [2024] FCA 671 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (31)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Dearman v Dearman [1908] HCA 84 Cited cited 67×
  2. Hall v Busst [1960] HCA 84 Cited cited 57×
  3. Computer Edge Pty Ltd v Apple Computer Inc [1984] HCA 47 Applied or followed cited 72×
  4. Norbis v Norbis [1986] HCA 17 Cited cited 255×
  5. Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Cited cited 1,469×
  6. Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Pty Ltd v Avion Engineering Pty Ltd [1991] FCA 566 Cited cited 35×
  7. Western Australian Branch v J-Corp Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 360 Cited cited 29×
  8. Caboche v Ramsay [1993] FCA 611 Cited cited 32×
  9. NZI Securities Australia Ltd v Poignand (1994) 51 FCR 584 Cited cited 23×
  10. Fraser v NRMA Holdings Ltd [1995] FCA 9 Cited cited 143×
  11. Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission [2000] HCA 47 Cited cited 399×
  12. Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy Union v Employment Advocate [2001] FCA 1442 Cited cited 14×
  13. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia [2001] HCA 17 Cited cited 848×
  14. Warramunda Village Inc v Pryde [2002] FCA 250 Cited cited 46×
  15. Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22 Cited cited 1,476×
  16. Dovuro Pty Limited v Wilkins [2003] HCA 51 Cited cited 152×
  17. Lewis v Hall [2005] FCAFC 251 Cited cited 14×
  18. Ho v Grigor [2006] FCAFC 72 Cited cited 15×
  19. Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22 Cited cited 819×
  20. Qantas Airways Limited v Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association [2011] FCA 401 Cited cited 2×
  21. BHP Coal Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2012] FCA 1495 Cited cited 3×
  22. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 148 Cited cited 10×
  23. N and E Bowder Pty Ltd v Australian Keg Company Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 288 Cited cited 10×
  24. Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 195 Cited cited 61×
  25. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30 Cited cited 620×
  26. King v Melbourne Vicentre Swimming Club Inc [2020] FCA 1639 Cited cited 3×
  27. Heiko Constructions T/A Heiko Constructions Pty Ltd v Tyson [2020] FCA 697 Cited cited 4×
  28. Southern Migrant and Refugee Centre Inc v Shum [2020] FCA 832 Cited
  29. Heiko Constructions T/A Heiko Constructions Pty Ltd v Tyson [2020] FCAFC 208 Cited cited 6×
  30. Griffiths v Power Ledger Pty Ltd [2020] FCCA 2846 Cited
  31. Okewood Pty Ltd v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (No 3) [2021] FCA 2 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.