Pinpoint · Judgment search

Masters v Lombe (liquidator), in the matter of Babcock & Brown Limited (in liq)

[2021] FCAFC 161 ; (2021) 392 ALR 326 ; (2021) 154 ACSR 612

Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · 3 September 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 5 indexed judgments

All Cited 5

2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2024: 3 citing judgments 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Lombe, in the matter of Babcock and Brown Ltd (in liq) [2022] FCA 957 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Crowley v Worley Limited (No 2) [2023] FCA 1613 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  3. Pain v Lombe (liquidator), in the matter of Babcock & Brown Ltd (in liq) [2024] FCA 1338 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  4. Masters v Lombe (liquidator), in the matter of Babcock & Brown Limited (in liq) (Lump Sum Costs) [2024] FCA 1336 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  5. Masters v Lombe (Liquidator), in the matter of Babcock & Brown Limited (in liq) [2024] FCA 1519 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (3)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Grant-Taylor v Babcock & Brown Limited (in liquidation) [2016] FCAFC 60 Cited cited 26×
  2. Masters v Lombe (Liquidator); In the Matter of Babcock & Brown Limited (In Liq) [2019] FCA 1720 Cited cited 11×
  3. TPT Patrol Pty Ltd as trustee for Amies Superannuation Fund v Myer Holdings Limited [2019] FCA 1747 Cited cited 27×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.