Pinpoint · Judgment search

The State of New South Wales v Reginald Collingwood (a pseudonym)

[2021] NSWSC 1365

Supreme Court of NSW · 26 October 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 3 indexed judgments

All Cited 3

2022: 3 citing judgments 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. State of New South Wales v TL (Final) [2022] NSWSC 1749 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  2. State of New South Wales v Keir (Final) [2022] NSWSC 1084 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  3. State of New South Wales v Hickey (Preliminary) [2022] NSWSC 1498 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (10)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. State of New South Wales v Pacey [2015] NSWSC 1983 Cited cited 81×
  2. Lynn v State of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 57 Cited cited 324×
  3. State of New South Wales v Naaman (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 328 Cited cited 55×
  4. State of New South Wales v Naaman (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1329 Cited cited 14×
  5. State of NSW v Tiggelen [2018] NSWSC 1399 Cited cited 5×
  6. State of NSW v Ceissman [2018] NSWSC 508 Cited cited 51×
  7. State of New South Wales v Sleeman (Preliminary) [2018] NSWSC 562 Cited cited 19×
  8. State of New South Wales v Sturgeon [2019] NSWSC 559 Cited cited 42×
  9. State of New South Wales v Cheema (Preliminary) [2020] NSWSC 876 Cited cited 21×
  10. State of New South Wales v Elomar (Final) [2021] NSWSC 411 Cited cited 3×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.