Pinpoint · Judgment search

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Ferratum Australia Pty Limited (in liq)

[2023] FCA 1043

Federal Court of Australia · 7 September 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 3

2024: 4 citing judgments 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v SunshineLoans Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] FCA 345 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  2. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Ferratum Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2024] FCA 701 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v NGS Crypto Pty Ltd (No 4) [2024] FCA 986 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  4. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Darranda Pty Ltd (Liability) [2024] FCA 1015 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (22)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Story v National Companies and Securities Commission (1988) 13 NSWLR 661 Cited cited 17×
  2. R J Elrington Nominees Pty Ltd v Corporate Affairs Commission (SA) [1989] SASC 1941 Cited cited 18×
  3. Newcastle City Council v GIO General Ltd [1997] HCA 53 Cited cited 233×
  4. Re Hres and Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2008] AATA 707 Cited cited 11×
  5. Hogan v Australian Crime Commission [2010] HCA 21 Cited cited 331×
  6. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 1430 Cited cited 60×
  7. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Camelot Derivatives Pty Limited (In Liquidation); In the Matter of Camelot Derivatives Pty Limited (In Liquidation) [2012] FCA 414 Cited cited 25×
  8. Legal Services Board v Gillespie-Jones [2013] HCA 35 Cited cited 53×
  9. Oreb v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2016] FCA 321 Cited cited 21×
  10. Giddings v Australian Information Commissioner [2017] FCAFC 225 Cited cited 19×
  11. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac Banking Corporation (No 2) [2018] FCA 751 Cited cited 57×
  12. Bayles by his litigation representative Bayles v Nationwide News Pty Limited (No 3) [2020] FCA 1397 Cited cited 3×
  13. Clime Capital Limited v UGL Pty Limited (No 2) [2020] FCA 257 Cited cited 11×
  14. Australian Securities & Investments Commission v AMP Financial Planning Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 69 Cited cited 36×
  15. HDI Global Specialty SE v Wonkana No. 3 Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 296 Cited cited 52×
  16. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v National Australia Bank Limited [2022] FCA 1324 Cited cited 9×
  17. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2022] FCA 1422 Cited cited 6×
  18. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac Banking Corporation (Omnibus) [2022] FCA 515 Cited cited 27×
  19. Porter v Dyer [2022] FCAFC 116 Cited cited 16×
  20. Ali v Insurance Australia Limited [2022] NSWCA 174 Cited cited 2×
  21. Nationwide News Pty Ltd v JS and SD [2022] NSWSC 774 Cited cited 8×
  22. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Membo Finance Pty Limited (No 2) [2023] FCA 126 Cited cited 3×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.