Pinpoint · Judgment search

Alvoen on behalf of the Wakaman People #5 v State Minister for the State of Queensland (No 5)

[2023] FCA 1593

Federal Court of Australia · 15 December 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (13)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. (1916) 12 Tas LR 26 Cited cited 5×
  2. Inglis v Moore (No 2) (1979) 46 FLR 470 Cited cited 10×
  3. Ditton v Gallagher (1992) 110 ACTR 12 Cited cited 5×
  4. Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11 Cited cited 2,226×
  5. Tullock v State of Western Australia [2010] FCA 351 Cited cited 6×
  6. Cheedy on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 163 Cited cited 30×
  7. A.D. (deceased) on behalf of the Mirning People v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2013] FCA 1134 Cited cited 3×
  8. Watson v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2014] FCA 127 Cited cited 16×
  9. Far West Coast Native Title Claim v State of South Australia (No 8) [2014] FCA 635 Cited cited 9×
  10. State of Western Australia v Banjima People [2016] FCAFC 46 Cited cited 5×
  11. Booth on behalf of the Kungardutyi Punthamara People v State of Queensland (No 2) [2017] FCA 844 Cited cited 2×
  12. Papertalk on behalf of the Mullewa Wadjari People v State of Western Australia [2022] FCA 221 Cited cited 8×
  13. Alvoen on behalf of the Wakaman People #5 v State of Queensland (No 4) [2023] FCA 837 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.