Pinpoint · Judgment search

Alvoen on behalf of the Wakaman People #5 v State of Queensland (No 4)

[2023] FCA 837

Federal Court of Australia · 24 July 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2023: 2 citing judgments 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Alvoen on behalf of the Wakaman People v State of Queensland [2023] FCA 953 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Alvoen on behalf of the Wakaman People #5 v State Minister for the State of Queensland (No 5) [2023] FCA 1593 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (8)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. De Rose v State of South Australia (No 2) [2005] FCAFC 110 (including summary) [2005] FCAFC 110 Cited cited 74×
  2. Jeffery & Katauskas Pty Limited v SST Consulting Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 43 Cited cited 119×
  3. Brown v The State of South Australia [2010] FCA 875 Cited cited 14×
  4. Sturt on behalf of the Jaru Native Title Claim v State of Western Australia [2018] FCA 1923 Cited cited 9×
  5. Miller v State of South Australia (Far West Coast Sea Claim) (No 2) [2018] FCA 599 Cited cited 27×
  6. Alvoen on behalf of the Wakaman People #3 v State of Queensland [2019] FCA 1469 Cited cited 16×
  7. Lawson on behalf of the Badimaya Barna Guda People v State of Western Australia [2020] FCA 104 Cited cited 10×
  8. Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 1) [2021] FCA 1463 Cited cited 9×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.