Pinpoint · Judgment search

Lingard v Commonwealth Bank Officers Superannuation Corporation Pty Limited (No 2)

[2024] FCA 536

Federal Court of Australia · 23 May 2024 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (10)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Anglo-Cyprian Trade Agencies Ltd v Paphos Wine Industries Ltd [1951] 1 All ER 873 Cited cited 95×
  2. Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11 Cited cited 2,226×
  3. BHAGAT V. ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE LIFE ASSURANCE AUSTRALIA LIMITED & ORS. [2000] NSWSC 159 Cited cited 27×
  4. Ogawa v The University of Melbourne (No 2) [2004] FCA 1275 Cited cited 27×
  5. King v Yurisich (No 2) [2007] FCAFC 51 Cited cited 19×
  6. Foots v Southern Cross Mine Management Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 56 Cited cited 208×
  7. GAIN Capital UK Limited v Citigroup Inc (No 2) [2016] FCA 243 Cited cited 5×
  8. El-Debel v Micheletto (Trustee) (No 2) [2021] FCAFC 146 Cited cited 11×
  9. Hamilton v Meta Platforms, Inc. (Costs) [2023] FCA 1496 Cited cited 4×
  10. Lingard v Commonwealth Bank Officers Superannuation Corporation Pty Limited [2024] FCA 174 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.