Pinpoint · Judgment search

AZR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

[2017] FCA 1453

Federal Court of Australia · 5 December 2017 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2017: 1 citing judgment 2018: 1 citing judgment 2017 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CRY16 [2017] FCAFC 210 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 119× · judgment
  2. Degning v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1152 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (17)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Tin v Minister for Immigration & Multicutural Affairs [2000] FCA 1109 Cited cited 61×
  2. Win v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1363 Distinguished cited 3×
  3. Paul v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1196 Cited cited 126×
  4. Singh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1679 Cited cited 20×
  5. VAAM v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 120 Cited cited 15×
  6. WAGP of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 266 Cited cited 39×
  7. VAAC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 74 Cited cited 120×
  8. VAF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 123 Cited cited 223×
  9. SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCA 24 Cited cited 440×
  10. SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] HCA 26 Cited cited 615×
  11. SZKTI v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCAFC 83 Cited cited 20×
  12. SZMTJ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) [2009] FCA 486 Cited cited 17×
  13. SZLPO v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship (No 2) [2009] FCAFC 60 Distinguished cited 8×
  14. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZKTI [2009] HCA 30 Cited cited 48×
  15. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIZO [2009] HCA 37 Cited cited 48×
  16. SZNKO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 297 Cited cited 25×
  17. AZR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection & Anor [2017] FCCA 1725 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.