Pinpoint · Judgment search

Safe Work (NSW) v WGA Pty Ltd

[2017] NSWDC 91

District Court of NSW · 10 April 2017 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (14)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Dunlop Rubber Australia Ltd v Buckley [1952] HCA 72 Cited cited 69×
  2. Smith v Broken Hill Pty Ltd [1957] HCA 34 Cited cited 69×
  3. Royall v The Queen [1991] HCA 27 Cited cited 140×
  4. WorkCover Authority of New South Wales v Kellogg (Aust) Pty Ltd [1999] NSWIRComm 453 Cited cited 73×
  5. Slivak v Lurgi (Australia) Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 6 Cited cited 79×
  6. Genner Constructions Pty Limited v Workcover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Guillarte) [2001] NSWIRComm 267 Cited cited 84×
  7. R v ACR Roofing Pty Ltd (2004) 11 VR 187 Cited cited 4×
  8. Thiess Pty Limited v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2010] NSWCA 252 Cited cited 53×
  9. John Holland Pty Ltd v Industrial Court of New South Wales; Parsons Brinckerhoff (Australia) Pty Ltd v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2010] NSWCA 338 Cited cited 37×
  10. Tangerine Confectionery Ltd and Veolia ES (UK) Ltd v R [2011] EWCA Crim 2015 Cited cited 35×
  11. Simpson Design Associates Pty Ltd v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 316 Cited cited 40×
  12. Laing O'Rourke (BMC) Pty Ltd v Kirwin [2011] WASCA 117 Cited cited 36×
  13. Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd v The Queen [2012] HCA 14 Cited cited 81×
  14. Bulga Underground Operations Pty Ltd v Nash [2016] NSWCCA 37 Cited cited 352×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.