Pinpoint · Judgment search

BPC16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

[2018] FCA 920

Federal Court of Australia · 15 June 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 8 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 2 Cited 6

2018: 6 citing judgments 2019: 2 citing judgments 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. DLC17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1226 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. DUV17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1492 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. DAY16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1750 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  4. DSD16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1782 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  5. AAY18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1844 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  6. AOV18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1871 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  7. BMP17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 112 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  8. DJB16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1161 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (24)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Da Costa v Cockburn Salvage & Trading Pty Ltd [1970] HCA 43 Cited cited 47×
  2. Warren v Coombes [1979] HCA 9 Cited cited 595×
  3. Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×
  4. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v C G Berbatis Holdings Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1151 Cited cited 69×
  5. Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1833 Cited cited 659×
  6. Appellant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 71 Cited cited 270×
  7. NAHI v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 10 Cited cited 358×
  8. Tran v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 297 Cited cited 31×
  9. Australian Retailers Association v Reserve Bank of Australia [2005] FCA 1707 (incuding summary) [2005] FCA 1707 Cited cited 96×
  10. Sagacious Legal Pty Ltd v Westfarmers General Insurance Ltd (No 3) [2010] FCA 428 Cited cited 18×
  11. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16 Cited cited 1,026×
  12. Kedem v Johnson Lawyers Legal Practice Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 3 Cited cited 22×
  13. SZSFS v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 534 Cited cited 20×
  14. MZAFZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1081 Applied or followed cited 73×
  15. BVZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 958 Cited cited 86×
  16. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v AMA16 [2017] FCAFC 136 Cited cited 50×
  17. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v BBS16 [2017] FCAFC 176 Cited cited 142×
  18. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2017] FCAFC 33 Cited cited 30×
  19. BPC16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCCA 1140 Cited
  20. CCW16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCCA 2 Cited cited 3×
  21. Graham v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 33 Cited cited 115×
  22. BOZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 418 Cited cited 15×
  23. DAO16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 2 Cited cited 167×
  24. Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16 Cited cited 326×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.