Pinpoint · Judgment search

ABJ17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

[2018] FCA 950 ; (2018) 260 FCR 295

Federal Court of Australia · 22 June 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 5 indexed judgments

All Cited 5

2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 2 citing judgments 2021: 2 citing judgments 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. DFS16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 944 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  2. BKX18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 432 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  3. BVC20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 565 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  4. Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v AWT19 [2021] FCAFC 58 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 13× · judgment
  5. AAZ19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 407 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (16)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Craig v South Australia [1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×
  2. Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×
  3. Tin v Minister for Immigration & Multicutural Affairs [2000] FCA 1109 Cited cited 61×
  4. Win v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 56 Cited cited 49×
  5. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30 Cited cited 1,750×
  6. Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30 Cited cited 630×
  7. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30 Cited cited 648×
  8. VAF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 123 Applied or followed cited 223×
  9. SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63 Cited cited 914×
  10. SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] HCA 26 Cited cited 615×
  11. Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales [2010] HCA 1 Cited cited 821×
  12. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18 Cited cited 1,516×
  13. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v AMA16 [2017] FCAFC 136 Cited cited 50×
  14. Shrestha v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 69 Cited cited 8×
  15. ABJ17 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2017] FCCA 1240 Cited
  16. Shrestha v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCATrans 179 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.