Pinpoint · Judgment search

AYQ18 v Minister for Home Affairs

[2019] FCA 1751

Federal Court of Australia · 25 October 2019 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Applied or followed 1

2023: 1 citing judgment 2019 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. AHN19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 802 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (22)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. O'Brien v Komesaroff [1982] HCA 33 Cited cited 408×
  2. Coulton v Holcombe [1986] HCA 33 Cited cited 1,127×
  3. Selvadurai v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 34 ALD 347 Cited cited 113×
  4. Selvadurai v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1994] FCA 301 Cited cited 15×
  5. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×
  6. Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1833 Cited cited 659×
  7. VUAX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158 Cited cited 600×
  8. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16 Cited cited 1,026×
  9. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT [2013] FCA 317 Cited cited 393×
  10. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18 Cited cited 1,516×
  11. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh [2014] FCAFC 1 Cited cited 378×
  12. MZZJO v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 80 Cited cited 30×
  13. AAM15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 804 Cited cited 80×
  14. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11 Cited cited 478×
  15. ARG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 174 Cited cited 135×
  16. Gupta v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 172 Cited cited 34×
  17. AVQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 133 Cited cited 69×
  18. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30 Cited cited 620×
  19. Minister for Home Affairs v AYJ17 [2019] FCA 591 Cited cited 9×
  20. DWA17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 160 Cited cited 8×
  21. Fattah v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 31 Cited cited 19×
  22. AYQ18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCCA 332 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.