Pinpoint · Judgment search

Madzikanda v Australian Information Commissioner

[2023] FCA 1445 ; (2023) 330 IR 387

Federal Court of Australia · 24 November 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 5 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 4

2024: 5 citing judgments 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Papoutsakis v Australian Information Commissioner [2024] FCA 75 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  2. Remawi v Australian Information Commissioner [2024] FCA 1156 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  3. Gunawardena v Boeing Aerostructures Australia Pty Ltd (Strike-out Application) [2024] FCA 1206 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  4. Liu v Australian Information Commissioner [2024] FCA 1287 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  5. Singh v Australian Information Commissioner [2024] FCA 1380 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (31)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34 Cited cited 3,164×
  2. Steed v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1981] FCA 197 Cited cited 34×
  3. Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81 Cited cited 1,205×
  4. Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×
  5. Enichem Anic Srl v Anti-Dumping Authority [1992] FCA 882 Cited cited 26×
  6. Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 Cited cited 452×
  7. Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd [1994] FCA 293 Cited cited 52×
  8. Wati, Grace Pushpa v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs & Anor [1996] FCA 1043 Cited cited 13×
  9. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×
  10. Ebner v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63 Cited cited 1,161×
  11. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia [2001] HCA 17 Cited cited 848×
  12. SBBS v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 361 Cited cited 133×
  13. Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184 Cited cited 654×
  14. Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] HCA 2 Cited cited 1,335×
  15. NEAT Domestic Trading Pty Limited v AWB Limited [2003] HCA 35 Cited cited 62×
  16. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6 Cited cited 918×
  17. NADH of 2001 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 328 Cited cited 103×
  18. SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63 Cited cited 914×
  19. SZFDE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] HCA 35 Cited cited 242×
  20. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZNPG [2010] FCAFC 51 Cited cited 92×
  21. Michael Wilson & Partners Limited v Nicholls [2011] HCA 48 Cited cited 444×
  22. Jones v Office of the Australian Information Commissioner [2014] FCA 285 Cited cited 11×
  23. Isbester v Knox City Council [2015] HCA 20 Cited cited 168×
  24. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH [2015] HCA 40 Cited cited 221×
  25. Burragubba v State of Queensland [2017] FCAFC 133 Cited cited 6×
  26. SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34 Cited cited 583×
  27. BRF038 v The Republic of Nauru [2017] HCA 44 Cited cited 11×
  28. Simjanovska v Department of Human Services [2019] FCA 499 Cited cited 14×
  29. Minister for Home Affairs v DUA16 [2020] HCA 46 Cited cited 78×
  30. Rana v Australian Information Commissioner [2022] FCA 817 Cited cited 6×
  31. Rana v Australian Information Commissioner [2023] FCAFC 17 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.