Pinpoint · Judgment search

Secretary, Department of Education v Derikuca

[2023] NSWCA 94

NSW Court of Appeal · 12 May 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (13)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Registrar of Titles (WA) v Franzon [1975] HCA 41 Cited cited 81×
  2. Thomson Australian Holdings Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission [1981] HCA 48 Cited cited 216×
  3. Philip Morris Inc v Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 7 Cited cited 198×
  4. News Ltd & Ors v Australian Rugby Football League Ltd & Ors Brisbane Broncos Rugby League Football Club Ltd & Ors v Australian Rugby Football League Ltd & Ors Cowboys Rugby League Ltd v Australian Rugby Football Club Ltd & Ors [1996] FCA 870 Cited cited 269×
  5. Forbes v Boston [1999] NSWSC 1217 Cited
  6. Strong Wise Limited v Esso Australia Resources Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 575 Cited cited 7×
  7. John Alexander's Clubs Pty Limited v White City Tennis Club Limited [2010] HCA 19 Cited cited 299×
  8. Hamod v State of New South Wales and Anor [2011] NSWCA 375 Cited cited 594×
  9. Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission [2013] HCA 39 Cited cited 164×
  10. Kassam v Hazzard; Henry v Hazzard [2021] NSWCA 299 Cited cited 38×
  11. Hobart International Airport Pty Ltd v Clarence City Council [2022] HCA 5 Cited cited 50×
  12. Wang v Meng [2022] NSWCA 215 Cited
  13. Derikuca v Secretary, Department of Education [2022] NSWSC 1239 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.