Pinpoint · Judgment search

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Katisat

[2005] FCA 1908

Federal Court of Australia · 23 December 2005 · Official judgment

Cited by 7 indexed judgments

All Cited 7

2006: 3 citing judgments 2007: 1 citing judgment 2008: 2 citing judgments 2023: 1 citing judgment 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. SZBZO v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 494 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Lay Lat [2006] FCAFC 61 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 89× · judgment
  3. SZGQL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1420 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  4. Fisher v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1052 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  5. SZKRR v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCA 145 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  6. SZGQI v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCA 114 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  7. DBD16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 362 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (20)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81 Cited cited 1,205×
  2. Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×
  3. Narang v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1515 Cited cited 2×
  4. Sandoval v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1109 Cited cited 2×
  5. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Miah [2001] HCA 22 Cited cited 479×
  6. Wu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 133 FCR 221 Cited cited 7×
  7. VEAL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 471 Cited
  8. WAID v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 220 Cited cited 18×
  9. NAQF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 781 Applied or followed cited 20×
  10. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v VEAL (2004) 138 FCR 84 Cited cited 3×
  11. Moradian v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 142 FCR 170 Applied or followed cited 11×
  12. WAJR v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 106 Cited cited 58×
  13. VAF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 123 Cited cited 223×
  14. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB [2004] HCA 32 Cited cited 456×
  15. SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 79 ALR 1009 Cited
  16. SZBDF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1493 Applied or followed cited 7×
  17. SZEGT v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1514 Cited cited 7×
  18. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Maltsin [2005] FCAFC 118 Cited cited 37×
  19. VJAF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 178 Cited cited 41×
  20. Applicant VEAL of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCA 72 Cited cited 257×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.