Pinpoint · Judgment search

Citigroup Pty Ltd v Mason

[2008] FCAFC 151 ; (2008) 171 FCR 96 ; (2008) 250 ALR 7

Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · 19 August 2008 · Official judgment

Cited by 7 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 3 Cited 4

2012: 2 citing judgments 2013: 1 citing judgment 2016: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2008 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Walker as liquidator of A.B.C. Learning Centres Limited (in liquidation) (Receivers and Managers appointed) (now known as ZYX Learning Centres Limited) [2012] FCAFC 68 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 5× · judgment
  2. Bradken Limited v Norcast S.ár.L [2013] FCAFC 123 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 17× · judgment
  3. Redbubble Ltd v Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation (Australia) Pty Limited [2021] FCA 1467 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (8)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia Inc [1999] FCA 18 Cited cited 147×
  2. Telstra Corporation Ltd v Treloar [2000] FCA 1170 Cited cited 42×
  3. Allesch v Maunz [2000] HCA 40 Cited cited 323×
  4. Hewlett Packard Australia Pty Ltd v GE Capital Finance Pty Ltd [2003] FCAFC 256 Cited cited 26×
  5. Sok v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 218 ALR 617 Cited
  6. A2 v Australian Crime Commission (2006) 235 ALR 264 Cited
  7. SZEEU v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCAFC 2 Cited cited 221×
  8. Telstra Corporation Limited v Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy [2008] FCAFC 7 Cited cited 49×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.